Evaluating your first agentยถ
In this tutorial, we'll build upon the web search agent from my_first_agent.ipynb and demonstrate how to evaluate its performance using any-agent's evaluation framework. We'll explore different evaluation methods including custom code evaluation, an LLM-based judge, and an agent-based judge.
Note: Since we are building on the previous notebook, we encourage you to run that one first to read through details and choices available while building the agent before evaluating it.
Install Dependenciesยถ
any-agent uses the python asyncio module to support async functionality. When running in Jupyter notebooks, this means we need to enable the use of nested event loops. We'll install any-agent and enable this below using nest_asyncio.
Inย [1]:
Copied!
import nest_asyncio
nest_asyncio.apply()
import nest_asyncio
nest_asyncio.apply()
Set Up the Web Search Agentยถ
First, let's recreate the web search agent from the previous tutorial so we have something to evaluate.
Inย [2]:
Copied!
import os
from getpass import getpass
if "MISTRAL_API_KEY" not in os.environ:
print("MISTRAL_API_KEY not found in environment!")
api_key = getpass("Please enter your MISTRAL_API_KEY: ")
os.environ["MISTRAL_API_KEY"] = api_key
print("MISTRAL_API_KEY set for this session!")
else:
print("MISTRAL_API_KEY found in environment.")
import os
from getpass import getpass
if "MISTRAL_API_KEY" not in os.environ:
print("MISTRAL_API_KEY not found in environment!")
api_key = getpass("Please enter your MISTRAL_API_KEY: ")
os.environ["MISTRAL_API_KEY"] = api_key
print("MISTRAL_API_KEY set for this session!")
else:
print("MISTRAL_API_KEY found in environment.")
MISTRAL_API_KEY found in environment.
Inย [3]:
Copied!
from any_agent import AgentConfig, AnyAgent
from any_agent.tools import search_tavily, visit_webpage
agent = AnyAgent.create(
"tinyagent", # See all options in https://mozilla-ai.github.io/any-agent/
AgentConfig(
model_id="mistral/mistral-small-latest", tools=[search_tavily, visit_webpage]
),
)
from any_agent import AgentConfig, AnyAgent
from any_agent.tools import search_tavily, visit_webpage
agent = AnyAgent.create(
"tinyagent", # See all options in https://mozilla-ai.github.io/any-agent/
AgentConfig(
model_id="mistral/mistral-small-latest", tools=[search_tavily, visit_webpage]
),
)
Run the Agent to Generate a Traceยถ
Now let's run our agent on a test query to generate a trace that we can evaluate.
Inย [4]:
Copied!
prompt = """What film won a Goya Award for best film in 2024?
Please provide the name of the film, the genre, a very brief
description of the film - and rotten tomatoes popcornmeter
score."""
agent_trace = agent.run(prompt)
prompt = """What film won a Goya Award for best film in 2024?
Please provide the name of the film, the genre, a very brief
description of the film - and rotten tomatoes popcornmeter
score."""
agent_trace = agent.run(prompt)
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ CALL_LLM: mistral/mistral-small-latest โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ INPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ [ โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "role": "system", โ โ โ โ "content": "You are an agent - please keep going until the user's query is completely resolved, before โ โ โ โ }, โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "role": "user", โ โ โ โ "content": "What film won a Goya Award for best film in 2024?\nPlease provide the name of the film, the โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โ ] โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ [ โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "tool.name": "search_tavily", โ โ โ โ "tool.args": "{\"query\": \"Goya Award for best film in 2024\"}" โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โ ] โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ USAGE โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "input_tokens": 498, โ โ โ โ "output_tokens": 24, โ โ โ โ "input_cost": 4.98e-05, โ โ โ โ "output_cost": 7.2e-06 โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ EXECUTE_TOOL: search_tavily โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ Input โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "query": "Goya Award for best film in 2024" โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ 38th Goya Awards - Wikipedia Winners and nominees ; Best Film ยท Society of the Snow โ Belรฉn Atienza [es], โ โ โ โ J.A. Bayona, Sandra Hermida Muรฑiz ยท Best Director ; Best Actor ยท David Verdaguer โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Award for Best Film - Wikipedia 2024 (39th) ยท Undercover, La infiltrada ; 2024 (39th) ยท The Blue Star, โ โ โ โ La estrella azul ; 2024 (39th) ยท A House on Fire, Casa en flames ; 2024 (39th) ยท Saturn Return โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Awards (2024) - IMDb GOYA AWARDS ยท Goya ยท Best Adapted Screenplay (Mejor Guiรณn Adaptado) ยท Robot โ โ โ โ Dreams ยท Society of the Snow ยท The Teacher Who Promised the Sea ยท Un Amor ยท Jokes & โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Awards Winners: 'The Society Of The Snow' Takes Best ... Goya Awards Complete Winners List: 'The โ โ โ โ Society Of The Snow' Takes Best Picture & Director; Sigourney Weaver Honored With International Goya. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Awards 2024 - MUBI Goya Awards 2024 ยท Anatomia de Uma Queda. Best European Film ยท Meu Amigo Robรด. Best โ โ โ โ Adapted Screenplay (Mejor Guiรณn Adaptado) & 1 other ยท 20.000 Arten von Bienen โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ CALL_LLM: mistral/mistral-small-latest โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ The film that won the Goya Award for Best Film in 2024 is "The Society of the Snow" (Spanish: La sociedad โ โ โ โ de la nieve). โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film is based on the true story of the survivors of the 1972 Andes flight disaster, who were forced to โ โ โ โ resort to extreme measures to stay alive after being stranded in the harsh mountain environment for over โ โ โ โ two months. The film is a survival drama that explores the themes of friendship, resilience, and the human โ โ โ โ spirit in the face of adversity. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film has a Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score of 89%, indicating critical acclaim. However, the Rotten โ โ โ โ Tomatoes Popcornmeter score, which reflects audience approval, is not readily available. โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ USAGE โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "input_tokens": 962, โ โ โ โ "output_tokens": 147, โ โ โ โ "input_cost": 9.62e-05, โ โ โ โ "output_cost": 4.41e-05 โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
View the Agent Resultsยถ
Let's first see what our agent produced:
Inย [5]:
Copied!
print(agent_trace.final_output) # Final answer
print(f"Duration: {agent_trace.duration.total_seconds():.2f} seconds")
print(f"Usage: {agent_trace.tokens.total_tokens:,}")
print(f"Cost (USD): {agent_trace.cost.total_cost:.6f}")
print(agent_trace.final_output) # Final answer
print(f"Duration: {agent_trace.duration.total_seconds():.2f} seconds")
print(f"Usage: {agent_trace.tokens.total_tokens:,}")
print(f"Cost (USD): {agent_trace.cost.total_cost:.6f}")
The film that won the Goya Award for Best Film in 2024 is "The Society of the Snow" (Spanish: La sociedad de la nieve). The film is based on the true story of the survivors of the 1972 Andes flight disaster, who were forced to resort to extreme measures to stay alive after being stranded in the harsh mountain environment for over two months. The film is a survival drama that explores the themes of friendship, resilience, and the human spirit in the face of adversity. The film has a Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score of 89%, indicating critical acclaim. However, the Rotten Tomatoes Popcornmeter score, which reflects audience approval, is not readily available. Duration: 21.29 seconds Usage: 1,631 Cost (USD): 0.000197
Method 1: Custom Code Evaluationยถ
Before using LLM-based evaluation, let's start with deterministic custom code evaluation. This is often more efficient, reliable, and cost-effective for specific criteria.
Some criteria are clearly quantitative: a result exists or it doesn't, it has a measurable length, the number of steps can be counted and a tool was either called or wasn't.
Inย [ย ]:
Copied!
from any_agent.tracing.agent_trace import AgentTrace
from any_agent.tracing.attributes import GenAI
def check_tool_usage(trace: AgentTrace, required_tool: str) -> bool:
"""Check if a specific tool was used in the trace."""
return any(
span.attributes[GenAI.TOOL_NAME] == required_tool
for span in trace.spans
if span.is_tool_execution()
)
def evaluate_web_search_efficiency(trace: AgentTrace) -> dict:
"""Custom evaluation function for web search agent efficiency criteria."""
# Direct access to trace properties
token_count = trace.tokens.total_tokens
step_count = len(trace.spans)
final_output = trace.final_output
duration = trace.duration.total_seconds()
# Check if web search tools were used
used_search = check_tool_usage(trace, "search_tavily")
used_visit = check_tool_usage(trace, "visit_webpage")
# Apply quantitative criteria
results = {
"token_efficient": token_count
< 20000, # Magic number alert: adjust to what you consider reasonable for your budget
"step_efficient": step_count
<= 10, # A high number of steps would point at problems, but this is also a debatable limit
"has_output": final_output is not None and len(str(final_output)) > 5,
"short_output": len(str(final_output)) < 10 if final_output else 0,
"used_web_search": used_search,
"used_webpage_visit": used_visit,
"reasonable_duration": duration < 60,
}
# Choose the quantitative criteria you care most about
results["passed"] = all(
[
results["token_efficient"],
results["step_efficient"],
results["has_output"],
results["used_web_search"],
results["short_output"],
]
)
return results
from any_agent.tracing.agent_trace import AgentTrace
from any_agent.tracing.attributes import GenAI
def check_tool_usage(trace: AgentTrace, required_tool: str) -> bool:
"""Check if a specific tool was used in the trace."""
return any(
span.attributes[GenAI.TOOL_NAME] == required_tool
for span in trace.spans
if span.is_tool_execution()
)
def evaluate_web_search_efficiency(trace: AgentTrace) -> dict:
"""Custom evaluation function for web search agent efficiency criteria."""
# Direct access to trace properties
token_count = trace.tokens.total_tokens
step_count = len(trace.spans)
final_output = trace.final_output
duration = trace.duration.total_seconds()
# Check if web search tools were used
used_search = check_tool_usage(trace, "search_tavily")
used_visit = check_tool_usage(trace, "visit_webpage")
# Apply quantitative criteria
results = {
"token_efficient": token_count
< 20000, # Magic number alert: adjust to what you consider reasonable for your budget
"step_efficient": step_count
<= 10, # A high number of steps would point at problems, but this is also a debatable limit
"has_output": final_output is not None and len(str(final_output)) > 5,
"short_output": len(str(final_output)) < 10 if final_output else 0,
"used_web_search": used_search,
"used_webpage_visit": used_visit,
"reasonable_duration": duration < 60,
}
# Choose the quantitative criteria you care most about
results["passed"] = all(
[
results["token_efficient"],
results["step_efficient"],
results["has_output"],
results["used_web_search"],
results["short_output"],
]
)
return results
Inย [7]:
Copied!
evaluation = evaluate_web_search_efficiency(agent_trace)
print("Custom Code Evaluation Results:")
for key, value in evaluation.items():
print(f" {key}: {value}")
evaluation = evaluate_web_search_efficiency(agent_trace)
print("Custom Code Evaluation Results:")
for key, value in evaluation.items():
print(f" {key}: {value}")
Custom Code Evaluation Results: token_efficient: True step_efficient: True has_output: True short_output: False used_web_search: True used_webpage_visit: False reasonable_duration: True passed: False
Method 2: LLM Judge Evaluationยถ
The method above is already useful and can assess quantitative results (how long or how costly answers were, whether a specific tool was present). Programmatic evaluations are less costly, more deterministic, but also less flexible. They can see that a tool was used: but was the result well understood? Was the content actually used to extract an answer? This is a qualitative assessment.
For such criteria, you can use the LlmJudge. This is great for evaluating response quality, helpfulness, and other subjective criteria.
๐ก Good to know: different modelsยถ
Notice we use a different LLM as a judge to the one we used for the original agent, as LLM judges are known to have a bias towards their own results.
Inย [8]:
Copied!
from any_agent.evaluation import LlmJudge
# Create an LLM judge
judge = LlmJudge(model_id="gpt-4.1-mini")
# Define evaluation questions - notice the last one is not like the others
evaluation_questions = [
"Did the agent provide a clear and concise answer?",
"Did the agent correctly identify the genre?",
"Did the agent provide a brief description (under 10 words) of the film?",
]
# Run evaluations
print("LLM Judge Evaluation Results:")
print("=" * 60)
results = []
for i, question in enumerate(evaluation_questions, 1):
result = judge.run(context=str(agent_trace.spans_to_messages()), question=question)
results.append(result)
print(f"Question {i}: {question}")
print(f" Passed: {result.passed}")
print(f" Reasoning: {result.reasoning}")
print("-" * 60)
# Summary
passed_count = sum(1 for r in results if r.passed)
print(f"\nOverall: {passed_count}/{len(results)} criteria passed")
from any_agent.evaluation import LlmJudge
# Create an LLM judge
judge = LlmJudge(model_id="gpt-4.1-mini")
# Define evaluation questions - notice the last one is not like the others
evaluation_questions = [
"Did the agent provide a clear and concise answer?",
"Did the agent correctly identify the genre?",
"Did the agent provide a brief description (under 10 words) of the film?",
]
# Run evaluations
print("LLM Judge Evaluation Results:")
print("=" * 60)
results = []
for i, question in enumerate(evaluation_questions, 1):
result = judge.run(context=str(agent_trace.spans_to_messages()), question=question)
results.append(result)
print(f"Question {i}: {question}")
print(f" Passed: {result.passed}")
print(f" Reasoning: {result.reasoning}")
print("-" * 60)
# Summary
passed_count = sum(1 for r in results if r.passed)
print(f"\nOverall: {passed_count}/{len(results)} criteria passed")
LLM Judge Evaluation Results: ============================================================ Question 1: Did the agent provide a clear and concise answer? Passed: True Reasoning: The agent clearly identified the film that won the Goya Award for Best Film in 2024 as "The Society of the Snow" and provided the genre (survival drama) along with a very brief description of the film's plot and themes. Additionally, the agent provided the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score (89%) and explained that the Popcornmeter score was not readily available. The response was direct, informative, and concise, adequately addressing all parts of the user's query except for the unavailable Popcornmeter score, which was explicitly mentioned as such. ------------------------------------------------------------ Question 2: Did the agent correctly identify the genre? Passed: True Reasoning: The agent identified the film 'The Society of the Snow' as a survival drama, which is an accurate genre for a film about the survivors of a plane crash in the Andes who endure extreme conditions. This matches the context provided, which describes the film as a survival drama exploring themes like resilience and the human spirit, consistent with the genre. Therefore, the agent correctly identified the genre. ------------------------------------------------------------ Question 3: Did the agent provide a brief description (under 10 words) of the film? Passed: False Reasoning: The agent provided a detailed description of the film, specifically stating it is about the survivors of the 1972 Andes flight disaster and themes of friendship, resilience, and the human spirit, but this description is longer than 10 words. Therefore, the agent did not comply with the requirement of providing a very brief description under 10 words. ------------------------------------------------------------ Overall: 2/3 criteria passed
๐ก Good to know: fuzzy criteriaยถ
Notice Question 3: if you run the evaluation multiple times, it won't pass or fail consistently, since the LLM judge may interpret that only the description should be under 10 words, not necessarily the whole Agent's answer. In the programmatic method, there is nothing to interpret: we check that the final output was under 10 words.
This showcases the main downside with using an LLM judge: as with humans, criteria can be misunderstood.
On the other hand, using a programmatic approach to assess clarity, for example, would have been rather complex without an LLM judge.
A take-home message here is to use custom code when criteria can be counted or measured, and think of using an LLMJudge when your criteria are qualitative.
Method 3: Agent Judge Evaluationยถ
For more complex evaluations that require inspecting specific aspects of the trace, we can use the AgentJudge. Notice the AgentJudge can:
- call built-in tools to get straight to relevant parts of the traces (e.g. final output),
- call additional tools that the original agent did not have. For example, you will see below how we give it a second search tool so it can do its own research to check if the original agent's answer was correct.
As with the LLMJudge, we choose a different model to the one enabling the original judge.
Notice, if you do not have a Tavily API key, you can import and use search_web (Duck Duck Go Search).
Inย [9]:
Copied!
from any_agent.evaluation import AgentJudge
from any_agent.tools import search_tavily
# Create an agent judge
agent_judge = AgentJudge(model_id="gpt-4.1-mini")
# Define a complex evaluation question that requires trace inspection
complex_question = """
Evaluate the agent's performance on this web search task by verifying
whether the agent correctly used web search to find relevant information
for the winner film of the Goya Award in 2024 and its Rotten Tomatoes rating?
Use the available tools to inspect the trace and, specially, make sure
the agent visited Rotten Tomatoes and checked the audience score, not
the critics score.
"""
# Run the agent judge evaluation
eval_trace = agent_judge.run(
trace=agent_trace,
question=complex_question,
additional_tools=[
search_tavily
], # Give the judge access to web search for verification
)
# Get the evaluation result
result = eval_trace.final_output
print("Agent Judge Evaluation Result:")
print("=" * 60)
print(f"Passed: {result.passed}")
print(f"Reasoning: {result.reasoning}")
print("=" * 60)
from any_agent.evaluation import AgentJudge
from any_agent.tools import search_tavily
# Create an agent judge
agent_judge = AgentJudge(model_id="gpt-4.1-mini")
# Define a complex evaluation question that requires trace inspection
complex_question = """
Evaluate the agent's performance on this web search task by verifying
whether the agent correctly used web search to find relevant information
for the winner film of the Goya Award in 2024 and its Rotten Tomatoes rating?
Use the available tools to inspect the trace and, specially, make sure
the agent visited Rotten Tomatoes and checked the audience score, not
the critics score.
"""
# Run the agent judge evaluation
eval_trace = agent_judge.run(
trace=agent_trace,
question=complex_question,
additional_tools=[
search_tavily
], # Give the judge access to web search for verification
)
# Get the evaluation result
result = eval_trace.final_output
print("Agent Judge Evaluation Result:")
print("=" * 60)
print(f"Passed: {result.passed}")
print(f"Reasoning: {result.reasoning}")
print("=" * 60)
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ CALL_LLM: gpt-4.1-mini โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ INPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ [ โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "role": "system", โ โ โ โ "content": "You are a helpful assistant that will be used to evaluate the correctness of an agent trace โ โ โ โ }, โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "role": "user", โ โ โ โ "content": "\nEvaluate the agent's performance on this web search task by verifying\nwhether the agent โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โ ] โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ [ โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "tool.name": "get_final_output", โ โ โ โ "tool.args": "{}" โ โ โ โ }, โ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "tool.name": "get_messages_from_trace", โ โ โ โ "tool.args": "{}" โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โ ] โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ USAGE โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "input_tokens": 554, โ โ โ โ "output_tokens": 42, โ โ โ โ "input_cost": 0.0002216, โ โ โ โ "output_cost": 6.72e-05 โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ EXECUTE_TOOL: get_final_output โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ Input โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ {} โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ The film that won the Goya Award for Best Film in 2024 is "The Society of the Snow" (Spanish: La sociedad โ โ โ โ de la nieve). โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film is based on the true story of the survivors of the 1972 Andes flight disaster, who were forced to โ โ โ โ resort to extreme measures to stay alive after being stranded in the harsh mountain environment for over โ โ โ โ two months. The film is a survival drama that explores the themes of friendship, resilience, and the human โ โ โ โ spirit in the face of adversity. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film has a Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score of 89%, indicating critical acclaim. However, the Rotten โ โ โ โ Tomatoes Popcornmeter score, which reflects audience approval, is not readily available. โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ EXECUTE_TOOL: get_messages_from_trace โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ Input โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ {} โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ system โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ You are an agent - please keep going until the user's query is completely resolved, before ending your turn โ โ โ โ and yielding back to the user. Only terminate your turn when you are sure that the problem is solved, or if โ โ โ โ you need more info from the user to solve the problem. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ If you are not sure about anything pertaining to the user's request, use your tools to read files and โ โ โ โ gather the relevant information: do NOT guess or make up an answer. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ You MUST plan extensively before each function call, and reflect extensively on the outcomes of the โ โ โ โ previous function calls. DO NOT do this entire process by making function calls only, as this can impair โ โ โ โ your ability to solve the problem and think insightfully. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ user โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ What film won a Goya Award for best film in 2024? Please provide the name of the film, the genre, a very โ โ โ โ brief description of the film - and rotten tomatoes popcornmeter score. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ assistant โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ [{"tool.name": "search_tavily", "tool.args": "{"query": "Goya Award for best film in 2024"}"}] โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ assistant โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ [Tool search_tavily executed: 38th Goya Awards - Wikipedia Winners and nominees ; Best Film ยท Society of โ โ โ โ the Snow โ Belรฉn Atienza [es], J.A. Bayona, Sandra Hermida Muรฑiz ยท Best Director ; Best Actor ยท David โ โ โ โ Verdaguer โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Award for Best Film - Wikipedia 2024 (39th) ยท Undercover, La infiltrada ; 2024 (39th) ยท The Blue Star, โ โ โ โ La estrella azul ; 2024 (39th) ยท A House on Fire, Casa en flames ; 2024 (39th) ยท Saturn Return โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Awards (2024) - IMDb GOYA AWARDS ยท Goya ยท Best Adapted Screenplay (Mejor Guiรณn Adaptado) ยท Robot โ โ โ โ Dreams ยท Society of the Snow ยท The Teacher Who Promised the Sea ยท Un Amor ยท Jokes & โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Awards Winners: 'The Society Of The Snow' Takes Best ... Goya Awards Complete Winners List: 'The โ โ โ โ Society Of The Snow' Takes Best Picture & Director; Sigourney Weaver Honored With International Goya. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ Goya Awards 2024 - MUBI Goya Awards 2024 ยท Anatomia de Uma Queda. Best European Film ยท Meu Amigo Robรด. Best โ โ โ โ Adapted Screenplay (Mejor Guiรณn Adaptado) & 1 other ยท 20.000 Arten von Bienen with args: {"query": "Goya โ โ โ โ Award for best film in 2024"}] โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ assistant โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film that won the Goya Award for Best Film in 2024 is "The Society of the Snow" (Spanish: La sociedad โ โ โ โ de la nieve). โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film is based on the true story of the survivors of the 1972 Andes flight disaster, who were forced to โ โ โ โ resort to extreme measures to stay alive after being stranded in the harsh mountain environment for over โ โ โ โ two months. The film is a survival drama that explores the themes of friendship, resilience, and the human โ โ โ โ spirit in the face of adversity. โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ The film has a Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score of 89%, indicating critical acclaim. However, the Rotten โ โ โ โ Tomatoes Popcornmeter score, which reflects audience approval, is not readily available. โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ CALL_LLM: gpt-4.1-mini โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "passed": false, โ โ โ โ "reasoning": "The agent correctly identified the winning film and provided relevant information about it. โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ USAGE โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "input_tokens": 1656, โ โ โ โ "output_tokens": 85, โ โ โ โ "input_cost": 0.0006624, โ โ โ โ "output_cost": 0.000136 โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ CALL_LLM: gpt-4.1-mini โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โญโ OUTPUT โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "passed": false, โ โ โ โ "reasoning": "The agent found the correct winning film and gave an accurate brief description. However, i โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โ โญโ USAGE โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ โ โ โ { โ โ โ โ "input_tokens": 1558, โ โ โ โ "output_tokens": 62, โ โ โ โ "input_cost": 0.0006232, โ โ โ โ "output_cost": 9.92e-05 โ โ โ โ } โ โ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ โ โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
Agent Judge Evaluation Result: ============================================================ Passed: False Reasoning: The agent found the correct winning film and gave an accurate brief description. However, it only provided the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer (critics) score and did not verify or report the Popcornmeter (audience) score from Rotten Tomatoes, as specifically requested. ============================================================
Notice how giving the judge tools enables it to check independently whether the original agent successfully did its job.